Ruleside
RulesHigh Foot & Scissor Kick
Law 12·fouls

High Foot & Scissor Kick

A raised foot near an opponent is dangerous play where the player is trying to play the ball and the action threatens injury, which needs no contact and gives an indirect free kick. A scissors or bicycle kick is permissible provided it is not dangerous to an opponent.4, 5, 6, 7

Key points

  • There is no high-foot rule. The offence is playing in a dangerous manner, and the boot is just the commonest way of committing it4, 5, 6
  • The player must be trying to play the ball. A raised boot with no ball in the picture is a challenge or violent conduct instead1, 6, 9
  • No contact is required: an opponent pulling out of a header for fear of injury is the offence, not a near miss6
  • The restart is an indirect free kick4, 5
  • A scissors or bicycle kick is permissible provided it is not dangerous to an opponent, so the attempt is lawful and only this one is in question7
  • Where the foot makes contact it is usually serious foul play, on either of two independent grounds: endangering the safety of an opponent, or excessive force or brutality2, 3, 8
  • The Laws draw no height line. "Shoulder height", "head height" and "high foot" all appear nowhere, so any height rule you have been taught is a working line and not the Law6
Read the full rule

Scenarios

Scenario 1

Player raises boot to play ball near opponent's head

Foul

A player raises their boot high to play a dropping ball. An opponent stooping to head the same ball pulls away to avoid being kicked, and there is no contact.

Correct call: Indirect free kick for playing in a dangerous manner. The player was trying to play the ball and the opponent was prevented from playing it for fear of injury.
Common mistake: Waving play on because there was no contact. The definition covers exactly this, and it does so in the words "preventing a nearby opponent from playing the ball for fear of injury".
Law4, 5, 6
Scenario 2

Bicycle kick in crowded penalty area

Foul

A player attempts a bicycle kick inside a crowded penalty area and their swinging leg passes close to two opponents' heads.

Correct call: Indirect free kick if the attempt was dangerous to an opponent, which a leg swinging past two heads normally is.
Common mistake: Allowing it because bicycle kicks are legal, or penalising it because they are dangerous. The Laws give the permission and attach one condition, and the condition is about this attempt and these opponents.
Law6, 7
Scenario 3

High foot makes contact with opponent's head

Red card

A player raises their boot for a high ball and the studs make contact with an opponent's head as that opponent moves in to head it.

Correct call: Sending-off for serious foul play. This is a challenge for the ball, and studs into a head endanger the safety of an opponent, which is a sufficient ground on its own without anyone having to call the force excessive.
Common mistake: Giving only the indirect free kick because the player was going for the ball. Going for the ball is what makes it a challenge, and a challenge that endangers safety is the offence.
Law2, 3, 8

The full rule

The Laws contain no rule about a high foot. What they contain is playing in a dangerous manner: any action that, while trying to play the ball, threatens injury to someone including the player themselves, and which includes preventing a nearby opponent from playing the ball for fear of injury. A raised boot near an opponent's head is the commonest way that happens, which is why it has a name in the game and none in the Laws. Two things follow. The player has to be trying to play the ball, so a boot raised at someone with no ball in the picture is a challenge to be judged as careless, reckless or excessive force, or violent conduct where there was no challenge for the ball, and not this offence at all. And no contact is needed, because the opponent withdrawing from a header for fear of being kicked is itself named in the definition. The restart is an indirect free kick. The scissors or bicycle kick has its own sentence, and it is a permission: permissible provided that it is not dangerous to an opponent. So the attempt is lawful and the question is only whether this particular one endangered someone. Where the raised foot does make contact, the offence usually stops being this one. A tackle or challenge that endangers the safety of an opponent must be sanctioned as serious foul play, and so must one that uses excessive force or brutality. Those are two independent grounds rather than one compound test, which matters because a boot into a head can endanger safety without anyone judging the force excessive. The height at which a foot becomes dangerous is not a line the Laws draw. Shoulder height, head height and waist height are absent from the document, so the working line below is Ruleside's rather than the Laws': in practice a foot raised near an opponent's head while they are playing the ball is dangerous, and the same foot at knee height with the opponent upright is usually not.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9

Investigate a foul call
Walk through the exact referee logic step by step
Investigate →