Fouls on the Goalkeeper
The Laws give the goalkeeper one protection nobody else has: they cannot be challenged at all while in control of the ball with the hands or arms. Preventing them from releasing the ball, or kicking at it as they release it, is a separate indirect free kick offence. Every other challenge on a goalkeeper is judged as it would be on any player: an offence when it is careless, reckless or uses excessive force.1, 2, 8, 9, 15
Key points
- ✓A goalkeeper in control of the ball with the hands or arms cannot be challenged at all11, 15
- ✓Any careless, reckless or forceful challenge on the goalkeeper is a direct free kick, on the same test as for any player1, 2
- ✓Where the ball is loose the goalkeeper has no special standing, so a foot played at a grounded keeper is judged as careless, reckless or excessive force1, 2, 4, 5, 6
- ✓Preventing goalkeeper releasing the ball = indirect free kick8, 9
- ✓Attempting to kick ball while goalkeeper is releasing it = indirect free kick8, 9
- ✓Goalkeeper collision with attacker: the test is careless, reckless or excessive force, not who arrived first1, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10
- ✓A goalkeeper fouled in their own penalty area: free kick from where the offence occurred, except inside the goal area, where it may be taken from anywhere in that area16, 17
Scenarios
The full rule
The goalkeeper is in a uniquely vulnerable position, often airborne, stretched, or on the ground with no ability to protect themselves. What the Laws do about that is narrower than it is usually described. There are exactly two goalkeeper-specific provisions. A goalkeeper in control of the ball with the hand(s)/arm(s) cannot be challenged by an opponent at all, and control is defined: the ball between the hands or between a hand and a surface, held in an outstretched open hand, or being bounced or thrown up. And an opponent may not prevent the goalkeeper releasing the ball from the hands, or kick or attempt to kick the ball while the goalkeeper is in the process of releasing it, which is an indirect free kick. Everything else is ordinary Law 12. A charge is an offence where the referee judges it careless, reckless or made with excessive force, and those three words carry the sanction as well as the decision: careless needs no card, reckless is a caution, excessive force is a sending-off. Charging is not banned, and the Laws do not set a separate standard for a charge on a goalkeeper. Where the ball is loose and the goalkeeper is not in control of it, a challenge is judged on the same test as any other, which in practice puts almost any foot played near a grounded goalkeeper into at least the careless band, because the danger and the lack of precaution are what the test asks about. That last step is Ruleside applying the test rather than quoting a rule, and the Laws work through no example of it. On a collision where both players go for the ball, the question the Laws ask is whether either player was careless, reckless or used excessive force, not who got there first: all players have a right to their position on the field, and being in the way of an opponent is not the same as moving into the way of an opponent. Where a goalkeeper is fouled inside their own penalty area, the free kick is taken from where the offence occurred, with one exception that covers most of these cases: a free kick to the defending team inside its own goal area may be taken from anywhere in that area.1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17