Denying a goal or an obvious goal-scoring opportunity (DOGSO)
The provision as it is printed, and everything on Ruleside that turns on it.
Where a player commits an offence against an opponent within their own penalty area which denies an opponent an obvious goal-scoring opportunity and the referee awards a penalty kick, the offender is cautioned if the offence was an attempt to play the ball or a challenge for the ball; in all other circumstances (e.g. holding, pulling, pushing, no possibility to play the ball etc.), the offending player must be sent off.
Verdicts that turn on it 2
Walk the tree to any of these and this clause is part of the answer.
Explained in the rules library 3
The plain-language pages that build on this provision.
Applied in these incidents 6
Real decisions where this clause decided what should have happened.
- Bosnia's defender correctly sent off for a DOGSO foul outside the boxSwitzerland vs Bosnia
- Penalty downgraded to a red card after VAR finds the foul was outside the boxQatar vs Canada
- Konsa's missed tackle should have been a penalty and a yellow card, not just a penaltyEngland vs Ghana
- Ngoy sent off after backpass error gifts Taremi a clear run at goalBelgium vs Iran
- Sithole sent off for dragging down Gutiérrez: DOGSO outside the boxMexico vs South Africa
- Goalkeeper's flying challenge correctly downgraded to a yellowSwitzerland vs Canada
Questions that ask it 3
Points in a walk where the reader is deciding this provision.
The Laws of the Game are published by The IFAB and quoted here for the purpose of explaining the decisions on this site. Ruleside is not affiliated with The IFAB or FIFA. Every clause of Fouls and Misconduct that Ruleside cites.